#blackinbrooklyntech On January 4, #blackinbrooklyntech started trending on Facebook, as black students from Brooklyn Technical High School spoke out about their experience at the elite school. One of eight specialized high schools in the city for which admission is based entirely on the results of an entrance exam, the Specialized High School Aptitude Test (SHSAT), Brooklyn Tech has a student body comprising 61 percent Asian, 20 percent white, 8 percent Latino and 8 percent black students, demographically similar to other competitive high public schools in the city, but not reflective of the city’s student population on the whole, approximately 70 percent of which is black and Latino.

But while some other sought-after high schools in the city require interviews and portfolios, and have individualized processes whose inherent subjectivity has long been thought to prioritize the school system’s white population, entrance into the specialized high schools is ostensibly race-and ethnicity-blind. In fact, the claimed benefit of the SHSAT is that, because it doesn’t factor in anything other than the score of this one test, it thus offers the fairest possible admissions process for students. And yet, the rise of #blackinbrooklyntech stands counter to this theory, and serves to illustrate that the demographic disparity at Brooklyn Tech and the rest of the specialized high schools (Tech has the most demographically diverse student body) has resulted in an allegedly hostile environment towards black students.

Screen Shot 2016-01-25 at 10.12.17 AM

Screen Shot 2016-01-25 at 10.16.23 AM

Screen Shot 2016-01-25 at 10.33.41 AMScreen Shot 2016-01-25 at 10.34.33 AM
The hashtag quickly became a digital safe space for black students to share stories of racism, ignorance, and/or the micro-aggressions they’d encountered from students and faculty, without fear of retaliation from the administration; it also became a catalyst for alumni and students from other elite NYC public high schools not only to share their own experiences, but also, in some cases, to offer disbelief at the racial tension which exists at Brooklyn Tech. And while, even in its infancy, the hashtag was mocked by people attempting to discredit the validity of the movement with the hashtag #whiteinbrooklyntech, the #blackinbrooklyntech movement grew, grabbing the attention of media outlets, the NYC Department of Education, and Brooklyn Tech principal Randy Asher.

Screen Shot 2016-01-25 at 10.15.25 AM

Brook Baker, a counselor at a tutoring program in Brooklyn where three of the students who started the hashtag intern (and, full disclosure, a roommate of mine), says the “breaking point” came following an incident this past winter recess. At that time, one of the students who would later start the hashtag was invited into a private chat room for the purpose of having racial slurs directed toward her and other minority students enrolled at Tech. After this happened, several students, including some representing the school’s Black Student Union, organized in order to break the silence surrounding racism at the school, and to shed light on Brooklyn Tech’s inability to create a safe and supportive learning environment for the entire student body.

 

chats

Principal Asher would go on to meet first with current students (and later, separately, with alumni) to address the racial climate at the school but his words were laughably empty, an indication that the meetings were not much more than a scramble for surface-level resolutions to appease the students, but more specifically the alumni, and to keep the situation from reaching the level of national significance that #Mizzou recently generated, which resulted in the resignation of the University of Missouri’s president and chancellor. And while talks to move the conversation at Brooklyn Tech forward appeared promising at first with the appropriate parties facing repercussions, it’s hard not to feel like the #blackinbrooklyntech movement, and the larger problems it attempted to address, is now getting swept under the rug. And yet the oft-unspoken problem at Brooklyn Tech and the other specialized schools remains: It is impossible to deal with institutional racism while also ignoring the ways in which race is an educational factor, and pretending that the playing field, i.e. the SHSAT, is at all level. Because while race does not affect one’s capacity to learn and excel, it does determine the opportunities and resources available to people of color, thus potentially limiting and certainly influencing them.

And while, to be fair, the race-based problems at Brooklyn Tech are but a microcosm of city- and society-wide issues; there’s little that Principal Asher can do beyond mandating diversity and sensitivity training for both students and faculty, implement mentorships and middle school outreach, along with other initiatives to drive out hate speech and enforce zero-tolerance policy at Brooklyn Tech, all of which is happening. The real issue of #blackinbrooklyntech, though, is that, at its core, this hashtag is not about the school’s negligence, and rather manifests before students even take the SHSAT, a point that Elizabeth Sciabarra, the Alumni Foundation Executive Director highlighted during the alumni meeting with the school on January 20 where she talked about getting alumni involved in middle school outreach.

“We want to talk about going into communities where we have not found significant representation. In this school, we have to start before students get here,” Sciabarra said. “So it’s important for you to have key information at your fingertips, but at the same time, it’s more about telling our young people in those middle schools that they can do it. And how they can do it, with the support so they can do it.”

It’s very common these days to hear everyone from educators to editors (to myriad other people) toss around the word “diversity” as a way of encouraging inclusivity and equality, but it is much less common to see true diversity exist in professional and social settings. Instead, “diversity” is more of an “empty buzzword” that results in little more than just another box being checked off on what’s desirable in our society. The existence of diversity sounds enticing, but rarely does it solve any problems—at times, diverse populations only serve to amplify them. The reality is that, statistically and anecdotally, diversity initiatives don’t always generate examples of success, and integration into predominately white spaces are frequently met with microaggressions and blatant racial bias from the once comfortable majority. As seen at Brooklyn Tech, being present doesn’t mean being welcomed. And a huge problem is that even in seemingly progressive places, like New York and its public school system, once racial issues are illuminated, as with #blackinbrooklyntech, it becomes very clear that while a diverse student body might be coveted, the experiences of its minority students are too often ignored.

Around Brooklyn

See More

7 COMMENTS

  1. Looks like some kids believed the hype from their neighborhoods, schools and parents that they were better than. They couldn’t deal when faced with people who were supposed to be lesser than them “didn’t stay in their place”. So they lashed out in stupid pitiful desperate attempts to put the “other” back down.

    As for the offending teachers, they obviously resent being teachers and can’t stand to see someone who will make better life choices than they did.

    It doesn’t help that it seems to be okay these days to harass people based on superficial, uncontrollable reasons such as God-given color.

    The principal should threaten to transfer the offending students to (insert large dangerous underperforming school here). After all, no other good school would want these bullies who aren’t as smart as they thought they were.

  2. Mr. Stewart,

    I am Brooklyn Tech alumni class of 2013. I was very happy when I saw that the black student union was standing up against racism for a better school environment. This however is a very separate issue from the SHSAT and it is a cheap grab to lump them together. The SHSAT is a standardized test that has been around now for quite some time. It has been around long enough that there are many free and cheap options available to study for it. I doubt putting lesser emphasis on the SHSAT and more on other methods of application like portfolios will make Brooklyn Tech much blacker, as all of the upper/middle class white kids who have been enrolled in sports and arts programs by their helicopter parents since they were toddlers will be able to provide well prepared portfolios AND will have taken advantage of free SHSAT programs all the while (I have seen this over and over and over again). Lowering the SHSAT admission score will not level the playing field. I was a very artistic and musical student when I applied to Brooklyn Tech. I wanted to be the next Frank Lloyd Wright. The SHSAT had nothing to do with architecture, but it did prepare me for the personal dedication I would need to be a successful student at Brooklyn Tech. Preparing for the SHSAT, with so many free and cheap classes and online guides available, is merely a choice of dedication ( I know, I grew up paycheck to paycheck). One may argue that the choice is not fit for young students, however if students cannot make that choice then they will suffer at this school. Brooklyn Tech IS NOT a talent or even an academic talent school. Tech has a large Asian population with a local tradition of sending children to weekend and summer tutoring, something that not only demonstrates the level of preparation taken for the SHSAT, but also for your regular classes as teachers do teach to the level of that tutored majority, who have learned the entire year’s curriculum the summer before. As someone who is not from the culture of preparing like that, I was taken by surprise. However, Brooklyn Tech is not a sea of robotic students. Brooklyn Tech IS a place where students who have a focus and are dedicated to teaching themselves, with industry professional guidance, about a specific career, can do so magnificently. Students need a great level of self-dedication and that starts before they arrive. For example, the admissions scores had lowered by my senior year, and the students were obviously less focused: graffiti in all of the staircases (mostly by “artsy” white kids), students seemed to not be able to go from class to class without starting a fire (a record 4-6 fires that year), students started getting into fights (I had never seen fights in previous years, we’re a school of over 5000 students with no metal detectors)! I hope it’s obvious that I don’t blame these things on race and that quite contrary I believe it has to do with the level of focus required to study for a standardized test because one will do anything to take the opportunity to participate in what Brooklyn Tech has to offer.

    The #blackinbrooklyntech hashtag is trying to make the Brooklyn Tech environment better for students, and the SHSAT has nothing to do with that. Brooklyn Tech does have problems with racism within the student body, however they are the standard establishment problem of BLACK-WHITE. The tension of race is a lot more culturally complicated than the American slavery/civil rights issue we here, rightly so, in the news. Brooklyn Tech, regardless of race, has a majority working and lower class, and majority immigrant population in which racism is present but entangled in ways that need their own special solutions. This is no excuse for racism, however I think it should be noted that this will not be solved with some blanket response. I’ve always thought that Brooklyn Tech and Principal Asher need more oversight, for reasons beyond racism, I think the best place to start would be to provide non-academic advisers to every student (as liberally as they do academic advisers) so students have a better outlet for the tension they have about other issues like their own race, economic status, and teenage angst instead of taking a cheap shot at students merely because of skin color.

  3. Fix the damn middle schools.

    Ms Schiabarra is absolutely right. And she knows: she was a faculty member at Tech in the 80s when Tech really was a diverse environment. No one is addressing the real issue: the horrible state of the middle schools. Schools like Phillippa Schuyler used to send Black kids to Tech in droves. Now its a trickle. Some middle schools arent encouraging their kids to take the test.

LEAVE A REPLY