It’s Good That Cops Turned Their Backs On De Blasio at a Funeral Again


Yesterday, police officer Wenjian Liu was laid to rest with a funeral service that had been delayed until a date when his family members could fly in from China. Along with Officer Rafael Ramos, Liu was murdered in Bed-Stuy on December 2oth by Ismaaiyl Brinsley, who subsequently killed himself. A funeral for Ramos was held last week, on December 27th. The murders of these two officers came after weeks of protests in New York City incited by a Staten Island grand jury’s decision not to indict NYPD officer Daniel Pantaleo in the death-by-chokehold of an unarmed black man, Eric Garner. While the protests in New York had been overwhelmingly peaceful, the attendant rhetoric—besides being explicitly accusatory toward the police force as a whole—ranged from passive chants (“We can’t breathe”) to obviously aggressive ones (“Kill the police”). Yet the protests remained relatively non-violent, and not only was the amount of arrests of protesters remarkably low, but marchers were given far more leeway to do things like shut down major traffic arteries (the Brooklyn Bridge, the West Side Highway) than one could imagine they would have had under past mayoral administrations.

It’s impossible to say if this type of peaceful protestor/police interaction would have lasted much longer—a flare-up of aggression on the Brooklyn Bridge on December 18th seemed to signal the end of this inherently tenuous equilibrium—because following the deaths of Liu and Ramos, tensions between the NYPD and the people it serves (aka you, me, and everyone you know… including the mayor) flared to a perhaps all-time high. First came the way that police officers turned their backs on Mayor de Blasio when he went to Woodhull Hospital to see the families of Liu and Ramos and to make a statement; next came the statements from official NYPD spokespeople like Pat Lynch, head of the PBA, in which de Blasio was accused of having “blood on his hands”; and then came Officer Ramos’s funeral, during which countless police officers turned their backs on de Blasio while he spoke—this in spite of the fact that de Blasio had called for a moratorium on protests in honor of the slain policemen. Apparently, the police don’t have a problem with protests when they’re the ones conducting them.

Prior to Liu’s funeral this weekend, Police Commissioner Bill Bratton released a department-wide memo asking officers not to protest at the funeral, writing: “A hero’s funeral is about grieving, not grievance.” But based on photos taken yesterday, hundreds, if not thousands, of officers ignored this request. While not all of the cops present were members of the NYPD (in fact, thousands were definitely not from New York City, but attended in a show of solidarity) and not all officers chose to turn their backs, the sheer number of policemen and women who engaged in this protest—and even the seeming reluctance with which some of them participated—demonstrates all you need to know about how the police force as a whole operates. And that’s a good thing.

It’s a good thing to have a reminder that police leadership in the form of Pat Lynch ( which, how any critically thinking police officer could deride de Blasio for fraternizing with Al Sharpton while having similarly incendiary blowhard Lynch as a spokesperson is baffling) has so little respect for the mayor—not to mention the significant majority of people in this city who voted for him—that it has turned funerals into fair game for protests, making the PBA not so different really than groups like the Westboro Baptist Church. It’s a good thing to have a reminder that, sure, “not all cops” (see photo below) will engage in this type of divisive protest, or are susceptible to such contemptible rhetoric as Lynch and his ilk espouse, but that, in fact, many will engage and are susceptible. It’s a good thing to be reminded that the NYPD seems to think it’s punishing this city for the sin of not loving it enough by dramatically decreasing the number of petty offense arrests it makes and tickets it writes. Of course, rather than being much of a punishment for the citizens of New York (none of whom seem to be complaining all that much about not getting ticketed or harassed for minor reasons), it’s only a punishment to the city’s coffers, which have long depended on this kind of income. It’s good to have a reminder that some of these cops probably wouldn’t have turned their backs on the mayor if so many others around them hadn’t done so, but that majority rules in situations like this, and cops are as susceptible to peer pressure as your average 8th grader, only the stakes are a lot higher.

But mostly, it’s a good thing that so many cops turned their backs on de Blasio at a funeral again, because it’s important to have this visual reminder that while the NYPD’s motto is “to protect and serve,” first and foremost among who they protect and who they serve is themselves. So even though police officers might self-righteously claim that de Blasio “doesn’t have our backs,” let’s not forget that those officers all have each other’s backs pretty securely. But people like Eric Garner and Akai Gurley and so many others? Those are the people who still need protection and people to fight for them, whether the police like it or not.

Follow Kristin Iversen on twitter @kmiversen




  1. There’s absolutely no correlation whatsoever between Westboro Baptist Church and the NYPD. None. Only well intended furious myopic millennials are making this outrageous ridiculous comparison. The officers have every right to engage in civil disobedience. After all, “we are not communists”. It’s never pretty – it usually gets out of hand. That’s why it’s called disobedient. And anyone over the age of 12 knows that all hell can break loose at a funeral when the attendees are pissed. Or drunk. Or both. It is much better for them to show their contempt openly, then subversively. As to the city’s penchant for making money off arresting people – well, if you’re truly liberal you might like the break in Broken Windows which leads to the most shameful incarceration rate on the planet.. But most liberals really aren’t liberal. NYC has a right wing mean streak, in addition to an elitist affluent wing – that can only be dealt with when it’s out in the open. Have you ever been to a family wake? Guess not. That said, Pat Lynch and Rudy Guilliani are treasonous fools. Let cops have their moment. Like the Ferguson protesters, at least their honest about their rage.

    • You missed the two points.

      First, protesting at a funeral is a disgusting gesture—the writer was trying to show how repulsive it is by making reference to the WBC. Granted the NYPD officers were part of the funeral unlike the WBC protesters, who are never invited to such funerals.

      Second, the officers who protested at these funerals ignored the Police Commissioner’s request that officers abstain from such behavior and that shows a worrisome behavior i.e. the protesting officers do not answer to the Commissioner, Mayor or rules of decency.

      I agree with you, the officers have a right to protest…but not at a funeral. Nevertheless, the point of this article is that their protest shows the officers true colors (protect each other first, even at the expense of the Mayor, Commissioner and the city) according to the author.

    • “The officers have every right to engage in civil disobedience. After all, “we are not communists””.Yes–the police, like everyone else, have a right to protest when they’re wearing civvies and not on duty. But not when they’re in uniform, on duty. A protest of this sort in the military would land a bunch of miscreants in the brig, on their way to a court martial and probable dishonorable discharge. I suspect that residents of NYC who’ve seen the cops up close back de Blasio in this instance. Protesting their private cause at a public funeral is exactly the sort of odious tactic that Westboro Baptist church revels in. They’re allowed to do that under the Constitution, but they aren’t paid for by taxpayers. NYPD did this on my dime, in the uniforms I and other taxpayers paid for.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here