Staten Island Students Revolt Against Sexist High School Dress Code


Staten Island’s Tottenville High School has a full-scale rebellion on its hands after instituting a strict new dress code that targets its female students. In the last two weeks, when temperatures were significantly hotter and the un-air-conditioned building presumably pretty uncomfortable for everyone sweltering in it, more than 200 students were issued detention for wearing clothes that, according to the new regulations, bared too much skin. No surprise that ninety percent of those offenders were girls, who the new code polices much more strictly.

The new dress code, originally named “Dress for Success,” bans shorts that are shorter than someone’s “relaxed fingertips,” along with low cut blouses, shirts that expose midriff, and short skirts. “Inappropriate dress can cause unnecessary distractions in classrooms and, more importantly, convey unintended wrong messages that are misinterpreted by peers,” the school’s website proclaims. The regulations for dudes? No “metal wallet or pants chains” or “muscle shirts.” You know, in case your peers misinterpret your attempts to be the frontman of Nickelback. Plus the ever-racially charged demand for “no hoodies.”

In response to the heightened scrutiny over their outfits, some students have staged a protest against the dress code by violating it every which way. “Tottenville should just be an all boys school considering this dress code is only affecting girls,” a student commented to CBS New York. Some parents are outraged by the school’s crackdown, others compared the scantily dressed girls to workers at a “strip club.”

There’s no question that dress codes are in place for high school girls more than high school boys, a move that very early on cements the backwards idea that women are the ones responsible for men’s actions. Tank tops in the classroom aren’t the problem. The problem is the pervasive attitude that we can’t teach boys to respect their peers, only advise girls to do damage control.


  1. It seems to target girls because girls wear those types of clothes. Obviously, the policies would disallow males from wearing the same banned clothes. It’s just that those types of clothing aren’t worn by males. A short skirt? If a male wore a short skirt he too, would be asked to change. A male shows off much of his chest but not his nipples? Same thing, he would not be allowed to wear that outfit. If a male wore a shirt that showed his stomach, he would be asked to change as well. If a male wore a sleeveless shirt, he would likely be asked to change when many schools actually allow girls to wear them… So, how about we consider clothing styles rather than the idea that they’re targeting females directly…


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here